Re: Reverse DNS for IPv6 tunnel
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2024 12:20 pm
Hello there,
Thanks for the PCAP!
I've sent you an email with some specific troubleshooting steps, but to update the thread here as well, my first suspicion is that you may be encountering the problematic behavior described by Tomoc in this thread.
In brief: When requesting both an IA_NA and a PD, the server processing your requests requires either both of these options to be requested in a single solicit, or for subsequent requests to have distinct DUIDs. If two solicits are sent with the same DUID, the latter will not be able to assign an address. This behavior has been acknowledged by the vendor, but we don't currently know when it will be changed.
There are two ways to dodge this behavior: using a DUID type that ensures each solicit has a unique DUID, or ensuring both options are requested in the initial solicit. If you're using networkd, you should be able to choose DUID type 1 (link-layer + time) to ensure uniqueness. Let me know if you're able to give that a try.
Thanks for the PCAP!
I've sent you an email with some specific troubleshooting steps, but to update the thread here as well, my first suspicion is that you may be encountering the problematic behavior described by Tomoc in this thread.
In brief: When requesting both an IA_NA and a PD, the server processing your requests requires either both of these options to be requested in a single solicit, or for subsequent requests to have distinct DUIDs. If two solicits are sent with the same DUID, the latter will not be able to assign an address. This behavior has been acknowledged by the vendor, but we don't currently know when it will be changed.
There are two ways to dodge this behavior: using a DUID type that ensures each solicit has a unique DUID, or ensuring both options are requested in the initial solicit. If you're using networkd, you should be able to choose DUID type 1 (link-layer + time) to ensure uniqueness. Let me know if you're able to give that a try.