Email address from @sonic.net NOT forwarding specific email(s)!?

General discussions and other topics.
2 posts Page 1 of 1
by orm » Sat Jan 11, 2020 6:13 pm
Was transferring a domain today. It was set up to have as the admin contact an email box at sonic.net that luckily kept the messages. For some reason, the notification of unlocked emails, authorization codes, and all emails after the transfer was initiated were forwarded from the sonic inbox, but NOT the repeat emails requesting a transfer initiation. This was so bizarre I didn't even log-in to check on this until the last step as I had such confidence in sonic of all the other services involved.

Transferring from Godaddy (they have messed with transfer requests in the past, so I was looking for that), to Namesilo (their like the sonic of domain name registrars, everyone should use them), with the admin contact on a non-private (public, since it's .us and privacy is not allowed) whois listing as a sonic.net email address, forwarding to a hotmail account.

All channels were working surrounding these emails and everything fired perfectly as intended to get around DNS/NS/Godaddy etc. problems by setting things up this way based on past experience and obvious best practices for example not using your admin contact as the email address you are attempting to transfer a domain with attached to that domain...

How/Why did this happen? Do I have to change what I thought was a pretty bullet proof system again? I've grabbed the header of these emails and I don't see a reason they weren't forwarded, here it is:

Code: Select all

Return-Path: <bounce+a72a9e.7bbab-MYSONICINBOXUSER=sonic.net@namesilo.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.3 (2019-12-06) on h.spam.sonic.net
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
    HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SNF4SA,SPF_HELO_NONE
    autolearn=disabled version=3.4.3
X-Spam-SNF-Result: 0 (Standard White Rules)
X-Spam-MessageSniffer-Scan-Result:
X-Spam-MessageSniffer-Rules:
    0-0-0-6044-c
X-Spam-GBUdb-Analysis: 0, 157.131.224.145, Ugly c=1 p=-0.513545 Source Normal
Received: from b.mx.sonic.net (a.spam-proxy.sonic.net [157.131.224.145])
    by b.local-delivery (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 00C1AQ7W022149
    (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT)
    for <MYSONICINBOXUSER@lds.sonic.net>; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 17:10:26 -0800
Received: from so254-58.mailgun.net (so254-58.mailgun.net [198.61.254.58])
    by b.mx.sonic.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 00C1AOZ7077206
    (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT)
    for <MYSONICINBOXUSER@sonic.net>; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 17:10:25 -0800
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=namesilo.com; q=dns/txt;
    s=krs; t=1578791425; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:
    Reply-To: From: MIME-Version: Subject: To: Message-Id: Date: Sender;
    bh=eEl7racOOx/1AyGgj/w+8ARfFCoTRjASGFUbCbNeh78=; b=C5E5gN372NB9wtVy3bjGvotlPk+ibObwq/TyeiMi6LEW+WOs8VQ2rC7LOCE0Gcw04LsIdUW6
    OcJOqOc2rhVnk6OHohrxghzl3yJ8XHlDDIDfKIcXpaaoKRC/zk4c6aeeqlOq81/sU0Pvhtze
    AgshM05LcuIMvkAx0ZZaH3PXlvE=
X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 198.61.254.58
X-Mailgun-Sid: WyJkNzFjMSIsICJ2b2RkZXJkb21haW5zQHNvbmljLm5ldCIsICI3YmJhYiJd
Sender: support@namesilo.com
Received: from m2.emailowl.com (m2.emailowl.com [198.199.111.6])
    by mxa.mailgun.org with ESMTP id 5e1a71ff.7ff5607a3df8-smtp-out-n01;
    Sun, 12 Jan 2020 01:10:23 -0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 2459 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2020 01:10:21 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=namesilo.com; s=dkim;
    t=1578791422; bh=kGyA6jDxfWDeUywbQiD5gTqYhWXFjzfzTkCRrjvx9WM=;
    h=Date:To:Subject:From:Reply-To;
    b=gqPxDuHuSaqyAEIuVUvKuEwByWe9FR4XtqdKoVy5H58Nee4/jiRw2QjoDP13oQ9Oo
    pN6cwXduXWUlPqtfDkDTuQw1bHXUwcDU626v7KwbQKBKQ16k5holQskkwt37U5ikV/
    ieRDRhYaJDZ/HW9RiubOr35kmcOtRCc4eSL38/4c=
Date: 12 Jan 2020 01:10:21 -0000
Message-Id: <20200112011021.2458.qmail@m.emailowl.com>
To: MYSONICINBOXUSER@sonic.net
Subject: Confirm Domain Transfer for MYTRANSFERRINGDOMAIN.us
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "NameSilo.com" <support@namesilo.com>
Reply-To: support@namesilo.com
X-NSID: ZmtmAmZ0ZmZmZt==q3q167sr1orn56707383n0r30s77r3pp
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Orthrus: tar=0 grey=no co=US os=Linux/3.11 and newer/1 spf=pass dkim=pass


Would a spam score of 1.1 meet a rule not to forward, but not to fire other actions? That's my best guess...
But, I can't find this in the members panel for the master user of that account.
by dane » Mon Jan 13, 2020 11:45 am
No, it's a spam score of negative 1.1, against a score of positive 5.0 required for the system to flag it as spam.

Must be something else. How are you forwarding? Do you know the receiving site isn't rejecting it? Forwarded messages are often suspect.
Dane Jasper
CEO
Sonic
2 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there is 1 user online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 422 on Sat May 26, 2012 5:28 am

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest