dane wrote:We'd think of that location as Lakeshore - which is largely served by underground utility lines, or back-of-lot lines which themselves are connected to underground facilities at the end of the block. This makes Lakeshore far less viable to serve, particularly as San Francisco does not currently allow microtrenching for fiber optic construction. For those in urban areas with underground utilities, small, less than 1" wide micro-trench methods are the most cost-effective construction method, so without that, you're stuck.Guest wrote:What is the southern limit for your Parkside installation? I'm on Crestlake, one block north of Sloat Blvd.
SF has discussed the idea of allowing micro-trenching, but doesn't appear to have made progress toward this yet. Do inquire with your Supervisor if you're interested in new infrastructure ever being built!
I thought that was the problem going south of Taraval, was it not? How it was solved then?