by
ankh » Thu Dec 17, 2015 11:45 am
virtualmike -- yes, I said my bill is for fixed IP, and that line wouldn't apply for the usual setup.
Point is, I don't know the default setup -- but for any other charges, I'd encourage them to be clear up front.
blackmage -- yes, Sonic's "no worse than" Comcast or ATnT -- that's praising with faint damn, I think.
And having charges on the web is good, yes. My neighbor would inquire by voice phone -- a matter of age and reading comfort -- if she follows up to contact Sonic.
I wanted her to understand that the letter's "$40/month" was, er, understated and the basic cost is somewhere around $60 per month.
I'd hope the people answering the phone know the Marketing people set them up a bomb on the $40 price.
I wanted Marketing to understand that the potential customer's first call shouldn't build in disappointment, to distinguish Sonic from the rest. And make it easier on the phone line staffers, too.
I repeat, I told my neighbor everything _else_ about Sonic is reliable, that was the only caution I had fo rher.
She told me what she considers a comparable issue about disclosing costs -- she almost signed up for Safeway home delivery recently but just didn't trust them to tell her the truth (in a 16 page small print agreement). And lo and behold, quite a few mostly older people got slammed and bit back:
https://www.google.com/search?q=safeway ... ry+lawsuit
I know, that's not even close to Sonic's approach. It's what my neighbor compared it to.
Mistrust and verify seems to be what's needed these days. Sonic's better than that.
Just sayin' -- reality is plenty good, and being real would improve the marketing effort.
Enough from me.