We here in Humboldt County were offline for 17 hrs yesterday because of a cable cut on the line that parallels Hwy 101 near Hopland. In 2011, they strung a second fiber line along Hwy 36--partially funded by public money--to help keep us always connected. Turns out that yesterday AT&T only used this second line to keep local high rollers connected, while the rest of us twisted in the wind.
So here's my question: I'm not an AT&T customer; I'm a Sonic customer. Sonic is an AT&T customer. AT&T may have no SLA accountability to me, but what about to Sonic? You know AT&T is going to plead "out of our control" for the outage, but if they had capacity available and simply chose not to use it, is that not something under their control, for which they must take responsibility?
I know that a day down on a $40 a month contract is a trivial amount of money, but a lost day's worth of productivity--everybody in the house works online--is considerably more than that.
So here's my question: I'm not an AT&T customer; I'm a Sonic customer. Sonic is an AT&T customer. AT&T may have no SLA accountability to me, but what about to Sonic? You know AT&T is going to plead "out of our control" for the outage, but if they had capacity available and simply chose not to use it, is that not something under their control, for which they must take responsibility?
I know that a day down on a $40 a month contract is a trivial amount of money, but a lost day's worth of productivity--everybody in the house works online--is considerably more than that.