Forbes article on privacy tools

General discussions and other topics.
1 post Page 1 of 1
by scott » Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:53 am
The operative term for privacy protection is "end-to-end encryption". Systems like pgp started to become popular in the 90's, but seem to have fallen out of use. Maybe it's time they become ubiquitous.

There's nothing wrong with wanting privacy. For example: when you send a postal letter, you put it in an envelope. There are also laws that protect you from interference in the U.S. postal system. It's simple: you want privacy, and you are reasonable in wanting that privacy.

Meanwhile, there is a (ridiculous) trend in government, in which they think they have to have access to everything you send electronically. Why? They _say_ it's to have the evidence for crimes you "might commit".

But what we see from this is more and more, governments using these powers for fishing expeditions, in which those caught up in their dragnets have made innocent statements that, _to them_ sound "suspicious."

There are also bona-fide cases where those in power have used these capabilities for paranoid or political advantage. Example: http://www.suntimes.com/news/cityhall/5 ... tment.html

Anyway, here's the article referred to in the Subject:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jonmatonis/ ... rypto-war/
1 post Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 135 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 135 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 999 on Mon May 10, 2021 1:02 am

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 135 guests