For goodness' sake, Sonic, please stop making your bills so difficult to pay.

General discussions and other topics.
13 posts Page 2 of 2
by cmeisel » Mon Mar 01, 2021 3:59 pm
sia wrote:
I've tried using Privacy.com in the past and failed - they wanted to login into my bank using my credentials to verify my account :-)
They've claimed they're working on fallback verification process using two small deposits, like other online services such as Paypal done for years.

I did not observe this. I logged into privacy, added my debit card (which, btw you can set all kinds of limits on so nobody could ever take 10k out) and they took out a small amount ($1.76) which showed seconds later on my bank. I then verified the account and voila, done.


The other downside is loss of some protections, provided by real credit card; it's actually pretty close, the main difference being source of the funds - when somebody charges 10K from your checking account and bank takes a month or two to put it back, it's much more painful in comparison to 10K taken out of your credit card account, even if eventual result ends up being the same. Fortunately you can reportedly set spend limits on Privacy.com virtual cards.

Not 100% true. Almost all accounts allow you to set all kinds of manual limits. Especially for the debit card itself (which is what privacy uses) you can set limits. And the privacy credit cards you generate themselves have limits. My test card for netflix (for example) has a limit of $20 per month.
This might not be the perfect solution (and I have to assume most people have credit cards) but it is better than nothing.

If you want to be really safe, get a master or visa card in your supermarket, add some cash to it and be done with it. But I assume most users who don't have a card don't want to or can't tie up cash in a card so for them privacy should work fine.


That difference between credit and debit networks is in fact what fuels Privacy.com business; the discount rate of 2-2.5% is what they (in part) receive and can even share with you (in the form of cashback). It's similar for Paypal; as long as they (Privacy or Paypal) can limit the risk of chargebacks they earn that difference.
by michael » Sun Apr 04, 2021 12:55 pm
u3zmsm wrote:
Refusing to open a Visa or MasterCard account is, frankly, a choice now well outside the mainstream

Sure. But don't try to sell that to me as if it's "the way of the future".

It's an historical aberration brought about by lobbyists for the banking industry distorting the free market over the last five decades, and its days are numbered. Merchants across the country have been fighting the banks' surcharge restrictions on constitutional grounds for about as long, and when they finally win, customers who want to use plastic will be faced with paying a surcharge that reflects the actual cost to the merchant. You'll see people carrying and using cash more, and the whole banking and credit processing industry put in its place.

Meanwhile, we're all paying higher prices, to merchants who jack up their prices to cover the overhead that they're prohibited from covering any other way right now.
Sonic customer since 2003
by virtualmike » Sun Apr 04, 2021 9:45 pm
OTOH, there are more and more merchants who recognize there's a cost to handling cash--storing/safekeeping, transporting, banking fees (yes, banks charge merchants to process large volumes of cash). And during pandemic times, a considerable number of merchants don't want to handle cash that may have been exposed.
13 posts Page 2 of 2

Who is online

In total there are 7 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 7 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 999 on Mon May 10, 2021 1:02 am

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests