I think it's worth a few, $5/month or $50/year.
So you'd pitch in $150 for three years Sonic.net customer access to ESPN3?naggi wrote:I think it's with a few $5/month or $50/year.
So you'd pitch in $150 for three years Sonic.net customer access to ESPN3?naggi wrote:I think it's with a few $5/month or $50/year.
$372,169.thulsa_doom wrote:That said, let's figure out how much it would cost to provide it for a year, not a ballpark guestimate but an actual figure that can be acted upon, then set up the kickstarter, and the folks that want it can either cover the cost or hold their peace. Let the battlecry go forth: give the people what they want (if they can demonstrate they really want it).
There's really not much of a comparison. First Row is a compilation of links to live feeds that most often do not work, and when they do the quality is really quite poor. I can't imagine First Row would satisfy a sports fan who wants to reliably watch a game.Alex wrote:Unless it's high definition (HD), otherwise you can get it from first row sports http://www.thefirstrow.eu/.
I would never use nor pay for this.dane wrote:I'm generally against the idea of charging all customers for access to an over-the-top Internet service such as ESPN3, which only some may want. It's not cheap, and would drive up the cost of all of our services for all of our customers.